Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 74
State of Oregon et al v. Azar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00317
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Oregon Medical Association, Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Oregon, American Medical Association and others
Amicus Curiae: New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sarah Isbell v. OKDHS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-16629
Plaintiff - Appellant: SARAH ISBELL
Defendant - Appellee: OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, JIM HUTCHINSON, Director Of Oklahoma Department of Human Services, in his official and individual capacities and others
United States of America v. State of California et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00490
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: State of California , Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr. and Xavier Becerra
Amicu: American Center for Law and Justice , State of Texas , State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of California et al v. Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff: State of California , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Isbell v. State of Oklahoma, Department of Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00269
Plaintiff: Sarah Isbell
Defendant: State of Oklahoma, Department of Human Services, State of California, Department of Child Support Services, Jim Hutchinson, Director Of Oklahoma Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Association of Wheat Growers et al v. Zeise et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02401
Plaintiff: Associated Industries of Missouri, Agribusiness Association of Iowa, National Corn Growers Association and others
Defendant: Xavier Becerra and Lauren Zeise
Amicus Curiae: State of Iowa, State of Indiana, The National Health Federation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Azael Perales v. FBI, et al
as 17-56213
Plaintiff - Appellant: AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Training Academy, National Academy, ALBANY, Counties Covered: Albany, Fulton, Hamilton, Montgomery, Rensselaer, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Warren, and Washington, ALBUQUERQUE, Counties Covered: Bernalillo, Catron, Cibola (eastern half Guadalupe, Quay, Sandoval, Soccorro, Torrence and Valencia and others
United States of America et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv05389
Defendant: Astellas Pharma, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Impax Laboratories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, John Radice, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Francis Grandinetti v. State of Texas and agents et al
as 2:2015cv06174
Respondent: All initiating parties or agents or contractors, David A. Burrows, Governor George W. Bush and others
Petitioner: Francis Grandinetti
United States of America et al v. DJO Global Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv07152
Defendant: Biomet, Inc., DJO Finance LLC, DJO Global Inc. and others
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, Russ Milko, Doris Modglin and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?