Cases 41 - 50 of 87
State of California et al v. Kevin K. McAleenan
as 2:2019cv07390
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
Save the Children Federation, Inc., American Medical Association, First Focus on Children and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Center for Food Safety et al v. Azar et al
as 3:2019cv05168
Plaintiff:
Center for Environmental Health and Center for Food Safety
Defendant:
Secretary Alex M. Azar, II, Health and Human Services, Norman E. Sharpless and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
County of Santa Clara et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2019cv02916
Plaintiff:
Trust Women Seattle, Medical Students For Choice, Bradbury-Sullivan LGBT Community Center and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M. Azar, II
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Institute for Policy Integrity
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra et al v. Azar
as 3:2019cv02552
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Eric Wright, Bettina Joyner and others
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Connecticut, State of California by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Service Employees International Union Local 503, Kay Wright, Ed Solseng and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Essential Access Health, Inc., et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-15979
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ESSENTIAL ACCESS HEALTH, INC. and MELISSA MARSHALL, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Amicus Curiae:
SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS, EQUALITY FEDERATION, FAMILY EQUALITY COUNCIL, GLMA: HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ADVANCING LGBTQ EQUALITY, THE HIV MEDICINE ASSOCIATION, THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSGENDER EQUALITY, THE NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE, THE SEXU, AMERICANS UNITED FOR LIFE and others
City and County of San Francisco v. Azar II et al
as 3:2019cv02405
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco
Defendant:
Roger Severino, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar II and others
Petitioner:
State of California, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra
Interested Party:
County of Santa Clara
Amicus Curiae:
Service Employees International Union, Local 1021, Institute for Policy Integrity, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
The Center for Investigative Reporting et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
as 3:2019cv01764
Plaintiff:
The Center for Investigative Reporting and Patrick Michels
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Essential Access Health, Inc. et al v. Azar II et al
as 3:2019cv01195
Plaintiff:
Essential Access Health, Inc. and Melissa Marshall, M.D.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M. Azar II
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Physicians, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Center for Food Safety et al v. Azar et al
as 3:2018cv06299
Plaintiff:
Center for Environmental Health and Center for Food Safety
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Health and Human Services, Department of, Scott Gottlieb and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
M.M.M et al v. SESSIONS et al
as 3:2018cv01832
Plaintiff:
M.M.M., L.C.O., I.A.T. and others
Defendant:
Alex Azar, Daniel A. Bible, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
