Cases 51 - 60 of 1,261
(PC)Jones v. Wasco State Prison et al
as 1:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Wayne E. Jones
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison, Night Duty Tower Officer, Gonzelas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Lewis v. Howells
as 3:2023cv01616
Plaintiff:
Daronta T. Lewis
Defendant:
David Howells, Kyle Williams, Kyle McCollin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Hayes v. Shirley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Tevin Hayes
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, J Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Wasco State Prison et al
as 3:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Wayne E. Jones
Defendant:
Wasco State Prison, Night Duty Tower Officer, Gonzelas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
Gordon E Hayes
Respondent:
Unknown Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Hayes-Kelly v. Curry et al
as 2:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Nicholas K. Hayes-Kelly
Defendant:
Clinton J. Curry, Ashley C. Tuft and Tyler Johannes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Gitter
as 2:2023cv00463
Petitioner:
Daveon Kyree Hayes
Respondent:
William Gitter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welsh-Hayes v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 4:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Ginnie Welsh-Hayes and Ginnie Welsh
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Charles Hayes v. LVMPD, et al
as 23-15403
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES HAYES
Defendant / Appellee:
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, DORIS HEARINGTON and JENNIFER WOOD
Defendant:
JOSEPH LOMBARDO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
