Cases 51 - 60 of 1,839
Rogers v. Reichard et al
as 2:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Ray Clarence Rogers
Defendant:
L Reichard, Taylor, Michael Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Gastelum-Medina v. Cain
as 2:2023cv01713
Petitioner:
Roger Gastelum-Medina
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina #357127 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv02411
Plaintiff:
Francisco Medina
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Diaz, et al.
as 23-3551
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, XAVIER BECERRA, KEITH L. FAGUNDES and others
768 Ceres, LLC v. Katherine Taylor Kahn et al
as 2:2023cv09723
Plaintiff:
768 Ceres, LLC
Defendant:
Katherine Taylor Kahn, Heather Lynn Ferguson, Juliana Medina and others
Kelly D. Robinson v. C. Fisher et al
as 2:2023cv09405
Plaintiff:
Kelly D. Robinson
Defendant:
C. Fisher, P. Castellanos, J. Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Morales et al
as 2:2023cv02263
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luz Maria Aguilar Morales, Eduardo Tomas Medina Mora Icaza, Lilia Monica Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Scally et al
as 2:2023cv01773
Plaintiff:
Albert Medina
Defendant:
James Scally, Bratt, Kenneth Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yolanda Medina v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv02249
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Medina
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
