Cases 51 - 60 of 143
Fuqua #215717 v. Raak et al
as 2:2018cv02337
Defendant:
Unknown Horn, Unknown Troman, Unknown Gonzelez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuqua #215717 v. Raak et al
as 2:2018cv01379
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Defendant:
Unknown Raak, D Webster, Unknown Higuera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Ray Hogan v. Timothy Filson, et al
as 18-99004
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY HOGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY FILSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Pitts v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00527
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, CI Industries - Inmate Kitchen, Hoskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2018cv00526
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Pitts
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Corrections, Corrections Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Kenneth Parks, et al
as 18-10059
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KENNETH KIM PARKS, GREGORY BART MARTIN, MICHAEL RAY TAYLOR, Jr. and others
Movant - Appellant:
KYN K. NAOPE
Michael Weeks v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-17133
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY WEEKS
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Stone v. Director Idaho Department of Juvenile Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00435
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Stone
Defendant:
Director Idaho Department of Juvenile Corrections, Emily Ulibarri and Idaho Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. USA (2255-(2:14-cr-00086-MCE))
as 2:2017cv01821
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Swanson v. United States Attorney
as 3:2017cv01164
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Swanson
Defendant:
United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
