Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 99
Arie Van Nieuwenhuyzen et al v. Stanley Sniff et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv02225
Defendant: Riverside County Sheriff's Department, County of Riverside, California and Stanley Sniff
Plaintiff: Arie Van Nieuwenhuyzen, Firearms Policy Foundation, The Calguns Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp et al v. Becerra et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02317
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, California Department of Justice, Brent E. Orick and others
Plaintiff: Ryan Gilardy, Second Amendment Foundation, Harry Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01115
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Defendant: Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, United States Department of State, Sarah Heidema and others
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety, Electronic Frontier Foundation and The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence
Interested Party: Benjamin Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Lori Rodriguez, et al v. City of San Jose, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-17144
Plaintiff - Appellant: LORI RODRIGUEZ, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC. and CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF SAN JOSE, SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT and STEVEN VALENTINE
Lori Rodriguez, et al v. City of San Jose, et al
as 17-17144
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., LORI RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF SAN JOSE, SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT and STEVEN VALENTINE
Wiese et al., v. Becerra, et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00903
Defendant: Xavier Becerra and Martha Supernor
Plaintiff: William Wiese, Jeremiah Morris, The Calguns Foundation and others
Petitioner: Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety and California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Knutson et al v. Curry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2016cv00062
Plaintiff: Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., Lenka Knutson and Knutson
Defendant: Chuck Curry, Curry and Tim Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez et al v. City of San Jose et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv03698
Plaintiff: Lori Rodriguez, Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., Calguns Foundation, Inc. and others
Defendant: City Of San Jose, City of San Jose Police Department and Steven Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Northwest School of Safety, et al v. Bob Ferguson, et al
as 15-35452
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND FOR I594, CHERYL STUMBO and WASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR GUN RESPONSIBILITY
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORTHWEST SCHOOL OF SAFETY, a Washington sole proprietorship, DARRYL LEE, GOTTLIEB FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, a Washington trust and others
Defendant / Appellee: BOB FERGUSON, Attorney General of Washington (in his official capacity), WASHINGTON ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, DOES I-V and others
Ivan Pena, et al v. Stephen Lindley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-15449
Plaintiff - Appellant: IVAN PENA, ROY VARGAS, DONA CROSTON and others
Defendant - Appellee: STEPHEN LINDLEY, Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION, LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?