Cases 71 - 80 of 227
Lujan v. Penzone
as 2:2019cv04435
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Plaintiff:
Loni Lujan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lujan v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2019cv00205
Plaintiff:
Michael V Lujan
Defendant:
IDOC, Twin Falls Co Jail, State of Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Punchard v. Luna County Board of Commissions et al
as 4:2019cv00159
Plaintiff:
Lord Punchard and Billy Punchard
Defendant:
Michell Lujan Grisham, New Mexico, State of, Deming City Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lujan v. U.S. Bank et al
as 1:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Access Behavioral Health Services, Inc, U.S. Bank, Lauri Stori and others
Plaintiff:
Michael V Lujan and Lujan's Bookkeeping Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Denby, et al v. City of Casa Grande, et al
as 19-15936
Defendant:
GARRIC BERRY, JANE DOE BERRY, JANE DOE ENGSTROM and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILMA J. LOGSTON, ELIZABETH J. TORRES and JAMES W. DENBY
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF CASA GRANDE and COUNTY OF PINAL
Kizer v. Lujan
as 2:2019cv04329
Petitioner:
David Alan Kizer
Respondent:
Luz Lujan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lujan v. Lilly et al
as 1:2019cv00148
Defendant:
Eli Lilly, Chase Bank, S. Lujan and others
Plaintiff:
Michael V Lujan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Lujan v. ODOC, et al
as 19-35403
Defendant / Appellee:
TROY BOWSER, Warden, COLLETTE PETERS, MONTOYA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. LUJAN
James Denby, et al v. Francisco Lujan, et al
as 19-15803
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILMA J. LOGSTON, ELIZABETH J. TORRES and JAMES W. DENBY
Defendant / Appellant:
KENT HORN, JANE DOE HORN, PAUL BABEAU and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF PINAL and CITY OF CASA GRANDE
Pedro Lujan Grajiola Jr. v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2019cv02481
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Pedro Lujan Grajiola, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
