Cases 71 - 80 of 135
Ehringer v. State of California et al
as 2:2016cv01955
Plaintiff:
Orion S. Ehringer
Defendant:
State of California, Sierra County, Darden Bynum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Helping Hand Caregivers, Ltd. v. Darden Corporation et al
as 2:2016mc00011
Defendant:
Darden Corporation, John Does, Greg M Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Helping Hand Caregivers, Ltd.
Darden v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv00559
Plaintiff:
Roberto Darden
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Darden v. Reliance Standard Insurance Company
as 8:2015cv01478
Plaintiff:
Steve Darden
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Insurance Company
Devarious Craig v. Emmanuel Pacquiao et al
as 2:2015cv06234
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Home Box Office Inc, Michael Koncz and others
Plaintiff:
Devarious Craig and Kristina Darden
In Re:Pacquiao-Mayweather Boxing Match Pay-Per-View Litigation
as 2:2015ml02639
In Re:
Pacquiao-Mayweather Boxing Match Pay-Per-View Litigation
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Tjaden, John Assalian, Enrique Barrios and others
Petitioner:
Showtime Networks Inc., Attorney Edgardo Lopez, Mr. Maximino Lopez and others
Defendant:
Floyd Mayweather, Mayweather Promotions LLC, EMMANUEL D. PACQUAIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Filiberto Martinez v. Darden Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03434
Defendant:
Darden Restaurants, Inc., Does, GMRI, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Filiberto Martinez
Jones v. Darden
as 3:2015cv02022
Plaintiff:
Anthony Reed Jones
Defendant:
M. Darden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyczynski v. GMRI, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00949
Plaintiff:
Karol Tyczynski
Defendant:
GMRI, Inc. and Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
