Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 156
Gibson et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00421
Plaintiff: Michael W. Gibson , Timothy E. Johns and B. G. Moynahan
Defendant: United States of America, United States Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05094
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Donald Allen, et al v. USA, et al
as 12-16573
Plaintiff - Appellant: DONALD ALLEN, BARBARA CRABTREE, LYNN CRABTREE and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo I, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-16539
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLOVERDALE RANCHERIA OF POMO INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA, a Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, JAVIER MARTINEZ, SARAH GOODWIN and others
Defendant - Appellee: KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, DONALD "DEL" LAVERDURE, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, MICHAEL S. BLACK, Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01377
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Albert Alto, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-56145
Plaintiff - Appellee: ALBERT P. ALTO, ANDRE E. ALTO, ANTHONY ALTO and others
Intervenor - Appellant: SAN PASQUAL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Defendant: KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the Department of the Interior, LARRY ECHO HAWK, Assistant Secretary of the Department of the Interior - Indian Affairs, MICHAEL BLACK, Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs of Department of Interior and others
People of the State of Califor, et al v. Imperial Irrigation District, et al
as 12-55956
Plaintiff - Appellee: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL. IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT, IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT and COUNTY OF IMPERIAL
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the United States Department of Interior, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY, COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT and others
People of the State of Califor, et al v. United States Department of In, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-55856
Plaintiff - Appellant: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL. IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT, IMPERIAL COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT and COUNTY OF IMPERIAL
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the United States Department of Interior, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY, COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT and others
Jared Bedke, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-35341
Plaintiff - Appellee: JARED K. BEDKE, BRUCE BYRON BEDKE and MARTHA JEAN BEDKE
Defendant: KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Defendant - Appellant: CASSIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, RANDY KIDD, in his official capacity as Cassia County Sheriff, CARY BRISTOL, in his official capacity as Cassia County Undersheriff and others
Kenneth Lee Garrett v. The City and County of the Santa Barbara Police Department We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv03722
Petitioner: Kenneth Lee Garrett
Respondent: The City and County of the Santa Barbara Police Department

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?