Cases 81 - 90 of 1,111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Topps
as 3:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dorian Duane Topps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Earl Williams v. Cisneros
as 22-55789
Petitioner / Appellant:
EARL DUANE WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
CISNEROS, Warden
Alexander Odette v. David Shinn
as 22-16269
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALEXANDER DUANE ODETTE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director
Hinds, et al. v. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.
as 3:2022cv04730
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hinds, et al., Deborah Hinds, Michael Hawkins and others
Defendant:
ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Apotex Corp., ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Valerie Vig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tapia v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
Javier Tapia
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Pierce County, Paul Pastor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jackson v. Newsome et al
as 4:2022cv04482
Plaintiff:
Arthur Duane Jackson
Defendant:
Mayor Gavin Newsome, Ron Davis, Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson-Knight v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv01282
Plaintiff:
Stephen Duane Johnson-Knight
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
