Cases 81 - 90 of 131
Lutz v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Martha Lutz
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jones et al v. Tulare County et al
as 1:2015cv01779
Plaintiff:
Wendy Jones and William Fabricius
Defendant:
Tulare County, Tulare County Animal Control, Tulare County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Tulare County et al
as 1:2015at00943
Plaintiff:
Wendy Jones and William Fabricius
Defendant:
Tulare County, tulare county animal Control, tulare county sheriff's office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bishop Paiute Tribe v. Inyo County, et al
as 15-16604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE
Defendant - Appellee:
INYO COUNTY, WILLIAM LUTZE, Inyo County Sheriff and THOMAS HARDY, Inyo County District Attorney
Beason v. Schaecher et al
as 2:2015cv01274
Plaintiff:
Roger Lynn Beason
Defendant:
Kim Brockamp, E. Lutz, Parole Board Members 2008 Thru 2015 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corona v. Lutz
as 6:2015cv01062
Plaintiff:
Reyna Rodriguez Corona
Defendant:
Pablo Osobampo Lutz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bishop Paiute Tribe v. Inyo County et al
as 1:2015cv00367
Plaintiff:
Bishop Paiute Tribe
Defendant:
Inyo County , William Lutze and Thomas Hardy
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Bishop Paiute Tribe v. Inyo County et al
as 1:2015at00192
Plaintiff:
Bishop Paiute Tribe
Defendant:
Inyo County, William Lutze and Thomas Hardy
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015at00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
