Cases 81 - 90 of 3,944
Maison v. NEXA Mortgage LLC
as 2:2023cv02190
Plaintiff:
Tom Maison
Defendant:
NEXA Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Turnbull v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel et al
as 2:2023cv01619
Plaintiff:
Edward Randolph Turnbull, IV
Defendant:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Doug Ende, Craig Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Jessie et al
as 2:2023at01039
Defendant:
Tom Jessie and Essentia Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tom v. Essentia Insurance Company
as 2:2023at01040
Plaintiff:
Jessie Tom
Defendant:
Essentia Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tom v. Essentia Ins. Co.
as 2:2023cv02322
Plaintiff:
Jessie Tom
Defendant:
Essentia Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
(PC) Brown v. Dirske, et al.
as 1:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
Tom Brown
Defendant:
Jeff Dirske, Stanislaus County, Dr. Hoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Brown v. Dirske, et al.
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
Tom Brown
Defendant:
Jeff Dirske, Stanislaus County, Dr. Hoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Orozco
as 3:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
Tom Blake
Defendant:
S. Orozco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tom Loughead v. Vivendi Ticketing U.S. LLC
as 2:2023cv08134
Plaintiff:
Tom Loughead
Defendant:
Vivendi Ticketing U.S. LLC, d/b/a See Tickets and Vivendi Ticketing U.S. LLC doing business as See Tickets
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PS) Sharma v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture et al
as 2:2023cv02118
Plaintiff:
Suneel Sharma
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture and Tom Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
