Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Republican National Committee et al v. Aguilar et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Republican National Committee, Nevada Republican Party and Scott Johnston
Defendant:
Francisco Aguilar, Lorena Portillo, Hoen Scott William and others
Intervenor:
Rise Action Fund, Institute for a Progressive Nevada and Nevada Alliance for Retired Americans
Amicus Curiae:
ACLU of Nevada and Democratic National Committee
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 20507 Administration of Voter Registration
Linthicum et al v. Wagner et al
as 6:2023cv01624
Plaintiff:
Dennis Linthicum, Rejeana Jackson, Klamath County Republican Central Committee and others
Defendant:
Rob Wagner and Lavonne Griffin-Valade
Amicus Curiae:
ACLU of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cowan v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Shawn Ryan Cowan
Defendant:
State of Montana, United States of America and ACLU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garred Norman v. State Bar of California, et al
as 23-16105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARRED F. NORMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, ALAMEDA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, BAY AREA LEGAL AID and others
American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 4:2023cv03450
Plaintiff:
American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU
Defendant:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Department of Homeland Security, ICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Chanh Trinh et al v. Brian Birkholz et al
as 2:2023cv04521
Plaintiff:
Chanh V. Trinh, Brian E. Sawyers, Dennis McPherson and others
Defendant:
Brian Birkholz, Bureau of Prisons, Law Office of Manatt, Phelps, and Phillips, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Couris, et al v. Kristina Lawson, et al
as 23-55069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL COURIS and MICHAEL FITZGIBBONS
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTINA D. LAWSON, in her official capacity as President of the Medical Board of California, WILLIAM J. PRASIFKA, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Medical Board of California and ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California
Intervenor:
LETRINH HOANG, D.O., PHYSICIANS FOR INFORMED CONSENT, a not for-profit organization and CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, a California Nonprofit Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE, COMPASSION & CHOICES, ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA and others
Mark McDonald, et al v. Kristina Lawson, et al
as 22-56220
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK MCDONALD and JEFF BARKE
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTINA D. LAWSON, in her official capacity as President of the Medical Board of California, RANDY W. HAWKINS, in his official capacity as Vice President of the Medical Board of California, LAURIE ROSE LUBIANO, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Medical Board of California and others
Intervenor:
LETRINH HOANG, D.O., PHYSICIANS FOR INFORMED CONSENT, a not for-profit organization and CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, a California Nonprofit Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE, COMPASSION & CHOICES, ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA and others
Ivan Lee Matthews II v. Twin Towers Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2022cv09420
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lee Matthews, II
Defendant:
Twin Towers Correctional Facility, Los Angeles Sherrifs Department, Los Angeles County Jail System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2022cv09083
Plaintiff:
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation and ACLU Foundation of Northern California
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties and U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
