Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Gomez v. Garland
as 23-702
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Miguel Gomez-Rodriguez v. William Barr
as 20-72330
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL GOMEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Gomez #154269 v. De La Santos et al
as 2:2018cv03294
Defendant:
Unknown Gomez, Unknown Williams, Unknown Coffman and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Angel Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abel Contreras et al v. XPO Cartage, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05725
Plaintiff:
Abimael Hernandez, Jose F. Castro, Manuel D. Martinez Mejia and others
Defendant:
XPO Port Services, Inc., XPO Logistics, Inc., XPO Logistics Port Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Miguel Gomez
as 16-56503
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL GOMEZ
Miguel Angel Gomez v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv03724
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Gomez
Respondent:
United States of America
Gomez v. Credit One Bank, N.A.
as 3:2016cv00659
Plaintiff:
Angel Gomez
Defendant:
Credit One Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Maria Gomez, et al v. Bank of America NA, et al
as 14-55129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIA DE LOS ANGELES GOMEZ, JUAN ELIAS GOMEZ, VACHIK Y. ALVANDI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA NA, a United States corporation for itself and as successor in interest for Countrywide Bank FSB, FKA Countrywide Bank NA, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC, a New York corporation, DBA America's Wholesale Lender and JOHN PARK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
