Cases 1 - 10 of 14,957
DISH Network LLC et al v. Valenzuela et al
as 4:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
DISH Network LLC and Sling TV LLC
Defendant:
Moses Anthony Valenzuela, TV Technologies LLC and Technology & Medical Store Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Electronic Communications Privacy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Winterer v. United States
as 2:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Jared Anthony Winterer
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. Thomas et al
as 5:2024cv03410
Plaintiff:
Gerald D.W. North
Defendant:
Wendi Thomas and Anthony Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Turner v. Weston, et al.
as 24-3562
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
W. WESTON, A. CAMPIN, C. BIRCH and others
Turner v. Weston, et al.
as 24-3563
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
W. WESTON, A. CAMPIN, C. BIRCH and others
Barbosa da Costa Araujo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3552
Petitioner:
ELIANE BARBOSA DA COSTA ARAUJO, DOMINICK COSTA ARAUJO and ANTHONY COSTA ARAUJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Anthony Joseph Sulla v. Damco Distribution Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04768
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Sulla
Defendant:
Damco Distribution Services, Inc., Maersk AS and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Contract Dispute
(HC) Bond v. Sacramento County
as 2:2024cv01598
Petitioner:
William Anthony Bond
Respondent:
Sacramento County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
