Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Elmi et al v. Estate of Abdi Ahmed Mohamed et al
as 3:2024cv08094
Plaintiff:
Adar Elmi, Mohamed Abdiaziz Omar, Kaha Abdiaziz Omar and others
Defendant:
Estate of Abdi Ahmed Mohamed, NRG Trucking Company, Nolan Transportation Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Elghembri v. California Dept. of Correction & Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2024cv02769
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
California Dept. of Correction & Rehabilitation and Ronald Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Doe, Dentist et al
as 3:2024cv02771
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dentist, John Doe, Dentist and Theodore Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Elghembri v. Muhammad
as 3:2023cv03328
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Chaplain Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gamily v. Garland
as 21-312
Petitioner:
AHMED MOHAMMED SHERIF GAMILY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mohamed v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv02062
Defendant:
Eby-Brown Company, LLC, James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
