Cases 1 - 10 of 307
Amos v. Kalama School District et al
as 3:2024cv05335
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Amos
Defendant:
Kalama School District, Billina Dolezal, Tiffany Fechter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Amos v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Larissa Amos
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. Elko County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Amos Jackson
Defendant:
Elko County Sheriff, Gonzales, A. Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amos Jones v. Pagliari
as 2:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Amos Jones
Defendant:
Richard M. Pagliari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Dr. Dre et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Defendant:
Neverland Rach, Wang Film Productions, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Balongo v. Balongo
as 1:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Amos Balongo
Defendant:
Andrea Wafula Balongo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Brooks et al v. Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Brooks, Laura Siegel, Tiffany Vinson and others
Defendant:
Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC, Greystar California, Inc., 100 Altair, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 dtp Diversity - Deceptive Trade Practices
Haugen et al v. Tyvan
as 2:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Kelly Haugen and Amos Haugen
Defendant:
Joshua Tyvan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Michael Gonzalez, Randy Barcena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
