Cases 1 - 10 of 21
S.Q. v. Echtenkamp et al
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
S. Q.
Defendant:
Emily Echtenkamp, Loren Calkins, Juan Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kumar, et al. v. Koester, et al.
as 23-4363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUNIL KUMAR and PRAVEEN SINHA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOLENE KOESTER, in her official capacity as Chancellor of California State University, LARRY ADAMSON, DIANA AGUILAR-CRUZ and others
Vargas Trejo v. Garland
as 22-1991
Petitioner:
JUAN ANTONIO VARGAS TREJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sunil Kumar, Ph. D. et al v. Dr. Jolene Koester et al
as 2:2022cv07550
Plaintiff:
SUNIL KUMAR, Ph. D. and PRAVEEN SINHA, Ph. D.
Defendant:
DR. JOLENE KOESTER, in her official capacity as Chancellor of California State University,, LARRY L. ADAMSON, DIEGO ARAMBULA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galindo et al v. City of San Francisco et al
as 3:2021cv08133
Plaintiff:
Dora Galindo, Juan Antonio Vargas and Rocio Anel Vargas
Defendant:
City of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department, Kyle Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hedilberto Vargas v. William Barr
as 20-72443
Petitioner:
HEDILBERTO ANTONIO VARGAS
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Rodriguez v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04559
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vargas Rodriguez
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017at00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Geovanny Vargas v. Dave Davey
as 16-56196
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEOVANNY ANTONIO VARGAS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVE DAVEY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
