Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Victoria Dillihunt v. Barack Obama et al
as 2:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Victoria T. Dillihunt
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Department of Children and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Diego Diego v. Meta et al
as 2:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Ramon Diego Diego
Defendant:
Maplebear Incorporated doing business as Instacart, Sundar Pinchai Alphabet Corporation doing business as Google, Costco Wholesale Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Downey v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv03717
Defendant:
United States of America et al and Apple Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark Downey
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Felicia M. Jackson v. Anthony M. Ellis et al
as 2:2017cv01642
Defendant:
Apple Corporate, Chyna Carroll, Anthony M. Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
Felicia M. Jackson
Sukit Kumvachirapitag v. Bill Gates, et al
as 12-16466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUKIT KUMVACHIRAPITAG
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL GATES, STEVE JOBS, WARREN BUFFET and others
Fulton v. Apple Corporation
as 2:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
Edward L Fulton
Defendant:
Apple Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sukit Kumvachirapitag v. Bill Gates, et al
as 11-17659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUKIT KUMVACHIRAPITAG
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL GATES, STEVE JOBS, WARREN BUFFET and others
Kumvachirapitag v. Gates et al
as 3:2011cv04510
Plaintiff:
Sukit Kumvachirapitag
Defendant:
Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Warren Buffet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kumvachirapitag v. Gates et al
as 4:2011cv04510
Plaintiff:
Sukit Kumvachirapitag
Defendant:
Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Warren Buffet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kumvachirapitag v. Gates et al
as 3:2011cv04405
Plaintiff:
Sukit Kumvachirapitag
Defendant:
Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Warren Buffet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
