Cases 1 - 10 of 6,305
Irby v. Morner, et al.
as 24-2908
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE JON IRBY
Defendant:
JACK MORNER, Superintendent of Prison, KEVIN BOWEN, Administrator Mission Housing, Chair of Mission Housing Department of Corrections and RONALD MEYERS, Custody Supervisor of IMU Unit C.U.S.
Bowen v. United States of America
as 24-2359
Petitioner:
CLIVE PATRICK BOWEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Hu
as 24-2136
Defendant:
BOWEN HU and Hukeer
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Delgado, et al. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
as 24-1845
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA BOWEN DELGADO, ROBIN BECERRA, STEVE BOZAN and others
Defendant:
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN, an employee health and welfare plan under he Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Walker v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-1806
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL WALKER, as Guardian of an incapacitated adult on behalf of Issac Contreras
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, AARON BOWEN, UNKNOWN BOWEN, husband and wife and others
Bowen v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Kathryn E Bowen
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Pierre v. Garland, et al.
as 24-1323
Petitioner:
ANTONIO EDIOR PIERRE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL and M. BOWEN, Warden
Bowen et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
William Bowen and Pamala Bowen
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02606
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bowen v. Clark County et al
as 3:2024cv05123
Plaintiff:
Stacy Bowen
Defendant:
Clark County, Grant Hagen, Austin Cloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
