Cases 1 - 10 of 79
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01399
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club and James Lee
Defendant:
Brian P. Lee, Jean Y. Lee and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Deeney v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08447
Plaintiff:
Unknown Party and Brian P Deeney
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Houston v. L.B.B.S., et al
as 23-15810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
L.B.B.S., Termed by ECF No. 5, DANIEL SCHWARTZ, CALVIN JOHNSON and others
Brian MoquinIn re: Brian Moquin
as 22-80124
Respondent:
In re: BRIAN P. MOQUIN, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 11, 2014
In the Matter of Brian P. Moquin Bar No. 257583
as 3:2022mc80283
Respondent:
Brian P. Moquin
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Houston v. L.B.B.S. et al
as 2:2022cv01780
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
L.B.B.S., Daniel Schwartz, Calvin Johnson and others
Shannon v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv05715
Plaintiff:
Brian P. Shannon
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Pax Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Ploom, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Linda Johnson v. Anthony Hsieh et al
as 8:2022cv00757
Plaintiff:
Linda Johnson
Defendant:
Anthony Hsieh, Patrick Flanagan, Nicole Carrillo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Troy Skinner v. Anthony Hsieh et al
as 2:2022cv02087
Plaintiff:
Troy Skinner
Defendant:
Anthony Hsieh, Patrick Flanagan, NICOLE CARRILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
