Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Gonzalez v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Balam Eugenio Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden Brian D. Phillips and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Cramer v. Macomber et al
as 1:2023cv01712
Plaintiff:
James Cramer
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Kathleen Allison, Theresa Cisneros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cappello v. Cisneros, et al.
as 23-3988
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK WILLIAM CAPPELLO
Respondent / Appellee:
TERESA CISNEROS and BRIAN D. PHILLIPS, Warden
Irwin Union Bank FSB et al v. M/Y Machiavelli, U.S.C.G. Official No. 1167583 et al
as 2:2023mc00046
Plaintiff:
Irwin Union Bank FSB, First Financial Bank NA and Cadle Company II Inc
Defendant:
M/Y Machiavelli, U.S.C.G. Official No. 1167583, BDL Worldwide LLC, Diversified Human Resources Incorporated and others
Receiver:
FDIC
Lewis v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08275
Plaintiff:
Brian D Lewis
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. USA
as 2:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Brian D Knight
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr. v. Brian D. Phillips
as 5:2023cv01199
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Respondent:
Brian D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Poslof, Sr. v. Phillips
as 1:2023cv00909
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Respondent:
Brian D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paden El Bey: Tiffany v. Doubles et al
as 2:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Paden El Bey: Tiffany
Defendant:
Brian Doubles, Synchrony and Doubles: Brian D
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01486
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
