Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Booth v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv04654
Not Classified By Court:
James G. O'Brien
Plaintiff:
David Booth
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Caouette, et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
as 12-80160
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JAMES CAOUETTE, JESUS CERVANTES, EMILY CERVANTES and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Caouette et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv01814
Plaintiff:
James Caouette , Jesus Cervantes , Emily Cervantes and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Booth v. Graber
as 4:2011cv00596
Petitioner:
Michael David Booth
Respondent:
Conrad M Graber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Booth v. USDC-WAESP
as 10-73599
:
In re: MICHAEL DAVID BOOTH
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DAVID BOOTH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mark David Booth v. Hacienda La Puente Unified School District et al
as 2:2010cv01063
Plaintiff:
Mark David Booth
Defendant:
Does, Hacienda La Puente Unified Shcool District, Sergio Martinez and others
Michael Booth v. USDC-WAE
as 09-72214
:
In re: MICHAEL DAVID BOOTH
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DAVID BOOTH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Trigger et al
as 2:2009cv00843
Plaintiff:
Judith Trigger, Judith Trigger, Judith Trigger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Booth v. Duncan
as 4:2008cv00536
Petitioner:
Michael David Booth
Respondent:
David Duncan
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Booth v. Bragg
as 2:2008cv00280
Petitioner:
Michael David Booth
Respondent:
M Travis Bragg
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
