Cases 1 - 10 of 365
Neal v. Barrett, et al.
as 24-2403
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH S. NEAL
Defendant:
Secretary BARBARA M. BARRETT, FRANK KENDALL, III, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE and others
Lecia L. Shorter v. The State of California et al
as 2:2024cv02799
Defendant:
Gina Clark Keaveny, SMBC Manubank, The State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Lecia L. Shorter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GEICO Choice Insurance Company v. Golden
as 2:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
GEICO Choice Insurance Company
Defendant:
David S. Golden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Benshoof v. Keenan
as 2:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Kurt A Benshoof and Kurt Benshoof
Defendant:
David S Keenan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neal v. Kendall, et al.
as 24-1286
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH S. NEAL
Defendant:
FRANK KENDALL, III, Secretary of the Air Force, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, DAVID S. CRUIKSHANK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Anya Roberts v. eXp Realty, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10492
Plaintiff:
Anya Roberts
Defendant:
eXp Realty, LLC, eXp World Holdings, Inc., Michael L Bjorkman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Peasley v. People of the State of California
as 3:2023cv04218
Petitioner:
David S. Peasley
Respondent:
People of the State of California and Warden McVay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lemanski v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08263
Plaintiff:
David S Lemanski
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurt Benshoof v. David Keenan, et al
as 23-35418
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KURT BENSHOOF, individually and on behalf of minor A.R.W.
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID S. KEENAN, ADRIAN DIAZ and JESSICA OWEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
