Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Victoria Dillihunt v. Jehovahs Witness et al
as 2:2023cv07729
Defendant:
Peter Hernandez, Montero Lamar Hill, Da Baby and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boggs et al v. City of Cut Bank
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tra Boggs, Dewayne Johnson and Roberta Corby
Defendant:
City of Cut Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas Dewayne Johnson v. Warden
as 5:2022cv01829
Petitioner:
Thomas DeWayne Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vicky Forrest et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05010
Plaintiff:
Vicky Forrest, Kathy Foster, Karen Frye and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Boggs et al v. City of Cut Bank et al
as 4:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Tra Boggs, Dewayne Johnson and Robert Corby
Defendant:
City of Cut Bank, John Does 1 and 2, Blackfeet Indian Nation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Lothrop
as 2:2020cv00908
Respondent:
William W Lothrop
Petitioner:
Antonyo Dewayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Arentz Law Group
as 3:2019cv07919
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Johnson
Defendant:
Arentz Law Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Johnson v. David Snow, et al
as 19-17063
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSHUA R. MESQITA, Phoenix Gang Unit Detective South Mountain Precinct, JACOB BROWN, BRIAN KAISER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DYWANE JOHNSON, AKA Michael Dewayne Johnson
Johnson v. Snow et al
as 2:2019cv04802
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Johnson and Michael Dywane Johnson
Defendant:
Brian Kaiser, Joan M Sinclair, Paul Vollmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeWayne Johnson v. Monsanto Company, et al
as 3:2016cv01244
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Steven D. Gould , Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
