Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Barsha Knox et al v. City of Pasadena et al
as 2:2023cv04447
Plaintiff:
Barsha Knox, CARLOS TOWNS and CT2
Defendant:
CITY OF PASADENA, EUGENE PPD CHIEF HARRIS, RALPH PALACIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Coulter v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv04514
Plaintiff:
Eugene Harry Coulter, Jr.
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona, State of, Corizon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coulter #285754 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv03435
Plaintiff:
Eugene Harry Coulter, Jr.
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Corizon and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv02168
Plaintiff:
Eugene Harris, III and Connie L. Harris
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., National Default Servicing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Darrell Harris v. S. Escamilla
as 17-15230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL EUGENE HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. ESCAMILLA
Darrell E. Harris v. Connie Gipson
as 5:2012cv00574
Respondent:
Connie Gipson
Petitioner:
Darrell Eugene Harris
Henry Eugene Harris v. Maurice Junious
as 2:2011cv10759
Petitioner:
Henry Eugene Harris
Respondent:
Maurice Junious
Henry Eugene Harris v. Lee Baca
as 2:2011cv01076
Respondent:
Lee Baca
Petitioner:
Henry Eugene Harris
Newbern et al v. De Los Reyes et al
as 3:2010cv00986
Plaintiff:
Michelle Newbern and Eugene Harris
Defendant:
Carisma De Los Reyes, Amber Aguilera, Betty Haze and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. The People of the State of California
as 3:2009cv02329
Petitioner:
Henry Eugene Harris
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
