Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Preston Martin-Richardson v. King County Correctional Facility, et al
as 23-35402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRESTON EUGENE MARTIN-RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KING COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN/JANE DOE, Warden, King County Correctional Facility, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-20, Director of Operations/Management and others
Martin v. Colbert
as 4:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Respondent:
D Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martin-Richardson v. King County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Preston Eugene Martin-Richardson
Defendant:
King County Correctional Facility, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Uttecht et al
as 4:2020cv05154
Defendant:
Ms Jane Nessen, Joshua Cruger, Stephen Sinclair and others
Plaintiff:
William Eugene Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00084
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Adam Martin v. Unknown Party
as 19-15605
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Warden USP - Tucson
Adam Martin v. Unknown Party
as 19-15160
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Warden USP - Tucson
Adam Martin v. USDC-AZT
as 19-70129
Undetermined:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Warden USP - Tucson
Other:
In re: ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Petitioner:
ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Adam Martin v. USDC-AZT
as 18-71723
:
In re: ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Petitioner:
ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Real Party In Interest:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Warden USP - Tucson
Martin v. Unknown Party
as 4:2017cv00371
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
