Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Whalen, et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
as 24-2086
Petitioner:
CHRISTINE WHALEN, KATHERINE ARCELL, JOSE BRITO and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Interested Party:
ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC., CERBERUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP and THE KROGER CO.
Freeman v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Autumn Freeman
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Mike Faust, Abraham Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Guaranteed Rate, Inc. v. Faust
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Guaranteed Rate, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard Faust and Richard M Faust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Faust v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2023cv02565
Plaintiff:
Lei Ann Faust
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCarthy, et al. v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., et al.
as 23-3458
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA MCCARTHY, MARY KATHERINE ARCELL, KEITH DEAN BRADT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC., INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE HOLDINGS, INC., ICE BENCHMARK ADMINISTRATION LIMITED and others
Defendant:
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC and THE NORINCHUKIN BANK
Eder v. Maui Electric Company, Limited et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Monica I. Eder, Rede S. Eder, Bruce Baum and others
Defendant:
Maui Electric Company, Limited, Spectrum Oceanic, LLC, Hawaiian Telcom and others
Cross Claimant:
County of Maui
Cross Defendant:
Roes 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Jimenez-Bencebi et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv02075
Plaintiff:
Bianca Jimenez-Bencebi and Jiaro Abrego Zavaleta
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Child Safety, Carin Patchin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Open Entry Services, et al. v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 23-2202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OPEN ENTRY SERVICES, a prepositional service provider of the United States and BRITTIAN WILLIE YOUNG, SR., Prepositional Negotiator for O.E.S.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, a territory of the U.S., UNKNOWN PARTY, named as ADEQ in original complaint, as state entity administrator, UNKNOWN PARTY 2, named as ADOCS in original complaint, as state entity administrator and others
Young et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv01786
Plaintiff:
Brittian Willie Young, Sr. and Open Entry Services
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Unknown Party, Misael Cabrera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Young v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 23-1554
Not Yet Classified:
AZ YUMA LIBRARIAN
Appellant:
BRITTIAN WILLIE YOUNG, SR.
Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA BOARD OF EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
