Cases 1 - 10 of 33
William Ollerton v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company et al
as 2:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
William Ollerton
Defendant:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, a subsidiary of AMPCO-Pittsburgh Corporation, individually and as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Fnc., individually and successor in interest to Buffalo Forge, Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff:
Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Shelton et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2021cv04772
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, BW/IP, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Schuyler and Frank J. Shelton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al.
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant:
DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Toy et al v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00326
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Standard Motor Products, Inc., Smothers Parts international and others
Plaintiff:
agnes toy, Thomas h. toy, sr, Thomas H. Toy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
In re Toy Asbestos Litigation
as 4:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
AGNES TOY, THOMAS TOY and Thomas H. Toy, Sr.
Defendant:
Copes-Vulcan, Inc., Genuine Parts Company, National Automotive Parts Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Toy et al v. Honeywell International Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00336
Defendant:
Viking Pump, Inc., Standard Motor Products, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
AGNES TOY, THOMAS TOY and Thomas H. Toy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
David Bennett, et al v. Crane Co., et al
as 17-55824
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID PAUL BENNETT and NAOMI BENNETT
Defendant - Appellant:
CRANE CO
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., AKA Buffalo Pumps, Inc., ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CBS CORPORATION, A Delaware Corp, successor-by-merger to CBS Corp. A Pennsylvania, FKA Viacom, Inc., FKA Westinghouse Electric Corp and others
David Bennett, et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 17-55718
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID PAUL BENNETT and NAOMI BENNETT
Defendant - Appellant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., AKA Buffalo Pumps, Inc.
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CBS CORPORATION, A Delaware Corp, successor-by-merger to CBS Corp. A Pennsylvania, FKA Viacom, Inc., FKA Westinghouse Electric Corp, CERTAINTEED, CORP. and others
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2017cv00595
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Barabin, Henry Barabin and Treco Construction Services, Inc
Defendant:
AstenJohnson, Inc, GOULDS PUMPS, INC., Grinnell LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
