Cases 1 - 10 of 243
Giancarlo Mondragon v. A. Palafox et al
as 2:2024cv06395
Defendant:
A.W. K. Huffman, A.D. H. Moseley and Lt. A. Palafox
Plaintiff:
Giancarlo Mondragon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Sniff
as 24-4268
Defendant:
STANLEY L. SNIFF, Riverside County Sheriff, in individual capacity and official capacity
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DAVID HUFFMAN
Huffman v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01309
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, Becton Dickinson and Company, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Lynda Cathryn Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brooks v. Gallagher et al
as 4:2024cv05028
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
K Gallagher, Lisa Robtoy, Lori Ramsdellgilkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024at00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Brooks v. Tenney et al
as 4:2023cv05163
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
Nancy Tenney, Corey Endo, K. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Versaci et al
as 1:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
Deandra M.K.K Huffman
Defendant:
Vincent W. Versaci, Kimberly B. Allen and Mark Kassner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huffman v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv01762
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Huffman
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Carly Sara Kaminska, Unknown Lord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
