Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lance Williams v. R. Farley, et al
as 23-55567
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE ELLIOT WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
R. FARLEY, Correctional Officer, D. AREBALO, Lieutenant Corrections Officer, individual and official capacity, M. WILLIAMS, Correctional Counselor Two, individual and official capacity and others
Lance Williams v. R. Farley et al
as 2:2020cv04490
Defendant:
D. Arebalo, D. Davis, M. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Lance E Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Salma Agha-Khan, et al v. Bank of America, et al
as 17-17262
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, CITIMORTGAGE INC. and others
In re: Salma Agha-Khan v. Bank of America, et al
as 17-71883
:
In re: SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Petitioner:
SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
BRETT P. RYAN, JONATHAN J. DAMEN, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP and others
Midland Funding LLC v. Flora Barrientos et al
as 2:2017cv04486
Cross Claimant:
Flora Barrientos
Defendant:
Flora Barrientos and Does
Cross Defendant:
Midland Funding LLC and Roes
Unknown:
Chad Kenneth Casey, Deanna Marie Fraser, Mishaela J Graves and others
Plaintiff:
Midland Funding LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Olpin v. San Diego, City of et al
as 3:2015cv00392
Plaintiff:
Tyler Gene Olpin
Defendant:
San Diego, City of , J. Graves , Dunnigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin Law Group v. Beck et al
as 4:2008cv00541
Plaintiff:
Baldwin Law Group
Defendant:
Dennis and Shirley Beck, Sheila Bennen, Robert and Jan Camps and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
