Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Chavez Mireles v. Garland
as 24-3074
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS CHAVEZ MIRELES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01631
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ermert v. Modernly Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Falco Ermert
Defendant:
Modernly Inc., Jose Antonio Chavez and Margarita Arambula Cano
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Chavez-Flamenco v. Garland
as 22-1877
Petitioner:
JOSE FRANCISCO CHAVEZ-FLAMENCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00456
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Martin Ruiz v. Miguel Marquez, et al
as 20-16962
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL MARQUEZ MARQUEZ, Guanajuato State Governor, MONSERRAT MARTINEZ SHOWS, Attorney, Secretary of Transparency and Render an Accounts of the Guanajuato State Government, ANGELICA RAMIREZ MORALEZ, Attorney, General Director of Labor, Subsecretary of Labor and Social Prevention and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN MORENO RUIZ
Jose Gonzalez Chavez v. William Barr
as 20-72702
Petitioner:
JOSE GONZALEZ CHAVEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Ruiz v. Marquez et al
as 2:2020cv01094
Defendant:
Luis Miguel Sanchez Hernandez, Maria Libia Gomez Padilla, Miguel Marquez Marquez and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
