Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Puki v. Okanogan County et al
as 2:2020cv00411
Defendant:
ABC Corporations, CD Cody P Lunn, CD Noah Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Puki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv05904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
G v. Idaho Department of Juvenile Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00464
Plaintiff:
A G
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Juvenile Corrections , Jerod Ward and John Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALT CREEK MEDIA, INC et al v. Marksys, LLC et al
as 2:2017at00364
Defendant:
Marksys, LLC, DMITRY BUDORAGIN, JEROD MEENTS and others
Plaintiff:
SALT CREEK MEDIA, INC and REDSTONE PRINT & MAIL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Salt Creek Media, Inc. et al v. Marksys, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00714
Defendant:
Marksys, LLC , Dmitry Budoragin , Jerod Meents and others
Plaintiff:
Salt Creek Media, Inc. and Redstone Print & Mail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Pacific Lock Company v. LockedUp Ltd. et al
as 2:2016cv04258
Defendant:
Does, Jerod Klink and LockedUp Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Pacific Lock Company
Dixon v. Kempf et al
as 1:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dixon
Defendant:
Kevin Kempf, Brent Reinke, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
as 3:2015cv04075
Plaintiff:
Jerod Harris
Defendant:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2014cv01624
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jerod Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
