Cases 1 - 10 of 13
AgWest Farm Credit v. Kimberly C et al
as 3:2024cv00565
Counter Defendant:
AgWest Farm Credit and Kimberly C
Defendant:
Yak 250
Claimant:
Petro 49, Inc. and Marvin L. Adams
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 31322 Mortgage Act of 1920
AgWest Farm Credit v. KIMBERLY C, O.N. 596518 et al
as 3:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
AgWest Farm Credit
Defendant:
KIMBERLY C, O.N. 596518, RM 250, O.N. 928702 and Yak Timber, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
White v Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05002
Plaintiff:
White C Kimberly and Kimberly C White
Defendant:
Kijakazi Kilolo and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DentaQuest LLC v. Lawson et al
as 2:2016cv02885
Plaintiff:
DentaQuest LLC
Defendant:
Kimberly C Lawson and Michael Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Swan v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv03558
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Kimberly C. Swan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
American Commerce Insurance Company v. Thompson et al
as 2:2015cv00235
Plaintiff:
American Commerce Insurance Company
Defendant:
Michael J Thompson, Questech Unlimited, Jason Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Splond v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00805
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Kimberly C. Splond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lee v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2012cv02210
Plaintiff:
Kimberly C. Lee
Defendant:
City of Stockton, Dameron Occupational OS-OHS, Corky Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. v. Soukup
as 2:2012mc00053
Plaintiff:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Kimberly C. Soukup
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
