Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Melba Ortega v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv03687
Plaintiff:
Melba Ortega
Defendant:
a municipal entity COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, an individual KONRAD THIEME and DOES 1-10 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Vinyard v. Konrad et al
as 2:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Joshuwa R. Vinyard
Defendant:
Konrad, Arana, Velasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Konrad L. Trope v. Kyriacos Tsircou et al
as 2:2023cv09148
Plaintiff:
Konrad L. Trope
Defendant:
Kyriacos Tsircou, Tsircou Law, Marika Tsircou and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Konrad L. Trope v. Theodore Robert Mandes, Jr. et al
as 2:2023cv08985
Plaintiff:
Konrad L. Trope
Defendant:
Theodore Robert Mandes, Sr., Theodore Robert Mandes, Jr. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
(PC) Nelson v. Schubert et al
as 2:2023cv02553
Plaintiff:
James Denerick Nelson, Jr.
Defendant:
Anne Marie Schubert, Dinah Mielke, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gray v. Konrad
as 2:2023cv02526
Plaintiff:
Forrest Gray
Defendant:
Konrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Konrad
as 3:2023cv02970
Plaintiff:
Forrest Edward Gray
Defendant:
Capt. Konrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Schoebel v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv08224
Plaintiff:
Eric Konrad Schoebel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
