Cases 1 - 10 of 426
Lamb v. Saguaro Trails Community Association et al
as 4:2024cv00507
Defendant:
ZBS Law LLP, Joseph J Tirello, Jr., Gary L Harrison and others
Plaintiff:
Mikkel-Stanley Lamb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson et al v. Community Clinic of Maui, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Tanya L Johnson and William R Torres, Jr
Defendant:
COMMUNITY CLINIC OF MAUI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv06587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Derrick L. Johnson v. Samantha P. Jessner et al
as 2:2024cv07683
Respondent:
Samantha P. Jessner and Attorney General Rob Bonta
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv01200
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
James L Johnson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Martinez, et al.
as 24-4638
Petitioner:
DERRICK L. JOHNSON
Respondent:
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and KELLY MARTINEZ, Sheriff of San Diego County
Johnson v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2024cv00934
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
Melvin L Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 24-3465
Plaintiff:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
JAMES WALKER, N. GRANNIS, S FLORY and others
Johnson v. Martinez
as 3:2024cv00981
Respondent:
Sheriff of San Diego County and Kelly Martinez
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derrick L. Johnson v. California et al
as 2:2024cv03735
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Johnson
Defendant:
California, Starbucks Corporation, Alan I. Rubin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1997 Institutionalized Persons Act of 1980
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
