Cases 1 - 10 of 2,283
Kapea v. Young Brothers, LLC
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Leonard Kapea
Defendant:
Young Brothers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
McMichael v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv02857
Plaintiff:
Leonard McMichael
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Berry v. Wallace et al
as 6:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leonard Berry
Defendant:
Wallace, Dirkson, Garibay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leonard Berry
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Honorable Judge Edmonds and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sean Paul et al
as 2:2024cv03602
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sean Paul, Troy Donald Jamerson, Ho Chi Mihn City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Baeza #341039 v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Leonard Baeza
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blockson v. Oliver
as 2:2024cv00809
Petitioner:
Christopher Leonard Blockson
Respondent:
Ronald Oliver and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witt v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02362
Plaintiff:
Leonard Witt
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wollersheim v. Ngyuen
as 2:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Mason Wollersheim
Defendant:
SA Francis T. Ngyuen, SA Leonard F. Reinhart, Christian L. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Collins et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv01796
Plaintiff:
Deborah Collins, Hunter Collins, Henry Morales and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
