Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Larson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05015
Plaintiff:
Cody M Larson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Larson et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 2:2021cv02221
Plaintiff:
Eric M Larson and Courtney L Larson
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Larson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01591
Plaintiff:
Katie M Larson
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant v. Larson et al
as 3:2014cv05993
Plaintiff:
Raymond M Grant
Defendant:
Linda M Larson, John W Morgan and Gary Wst
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Larson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
Mary Elaine Larson and Niel M. Larson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly et al v. Associated Employees Group Benefit Plan and Trust et al
as 1:2008cv00079
Plaintiff:
Darcy Kelly, William Kelly, Susan M. Larson and others
Defendant:
Associated Employees Group Benefit Plan and Trust, Associated Employees Group Benefit Plan and Trust, Employee Benefit Management Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Larson v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv01886
Plaintiff:
Tina M Larson
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
