Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ruby Grapes, LLC v. Gerlach et al
as 4:2020cv09363
Defendant:
Richard W Gerlach, The Great Coliseum, L.L.C., Jeffery Wayne Hansen and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
AH Wines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ruby Grapes, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Omega Winery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01169
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2013cv00612
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Donna Marie Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Karen Hansen v. Unknown Mitchell, et al
as 12-16720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN MARIE HANSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN MITCHELL, Sgt., ASPC - Mail and Property Sgt., UNKNOWN MIMS, Correctional Officer II, ASPC-Mail and Property Officer, IRA L. JONES, CO III and others
Paiute Pipeline Company v. Heavenly Valley Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2010cv00661
Defendant:
California Interstate Telephone Company, Century 21, Tahoe Pines Realty, Clover Valley Lumber Company and others
775)588-1326 (fax:
William Cole
702)382-1894 (fax:
Paiute Pipeline Company
619)299-8463 (fax:
Fred Totah
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Hansen v. Ryan et al
as 2:2009cv01290
Plaintiff:
Karen Marie Hansen
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Therese Schroeder, Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hansen v. Schriro et al
as 3:2008cv08151
Petitioner:
Karen Marie Hansen
Respondent:
Dora Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hansen v. Schriro et al
as 2:2007cv02105
Plaintiff:
Karen Marie Hansen
Defendant:
Dora Schriro, Dennis Harkins, Michelle Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
