Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
(HC) McCormick v. Trate We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00176
Petitioner: Michael McCormick
Respondent: Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MKM Healthcare Solutions LLC et al v. Biotronik Incorporated We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01495
Plaintiff: MKM Healthcare Solutions LLC and Michael McCormick
Defendant: Biotronik Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MKM Healthcare Solutions LLC et al v. Biotronik Incorporated We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00255
Plaintiff: Michael McCormick and MKM Healthcare Solutions LLC
Defendant: Biotronik Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shayla Duke, et al v. Clyde Saiki, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35155
Defendant: REGINALD C. RICHARDSON, Dr., GLORIA TAYLOR OLIVARES, BRIAN KIMBELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID DUKE and SHAYLA DUKE
Defendant / Appellee: ASHLEY CARSON COTTINGHAM, in her official capacity as the Director of Aging and People with Disabilities, Oregon Department of Human Services, CLYDE SAIKI, in his personal and official capacity as former Director of Department of Human Services, State of Oregon and FARIBORZ PAKSERESHT, in his personal and official capacity as Director of Department of Human Services, State of Oregon
Shayla Duke, et al v. Clyde Saiki, et al
as 19-35716
Defendant: REGINALD C. RICHARDSON, Dr.; in his official capacity as the Deputy Director for the Oregon Department of Human Services, HEATHER BELL, in her official capacity as an Hearings Representative for Aging and People with Disabilities, Oregon Department of Human Services, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID DUKE and SHAYLA DUKE
Defendant / Appellee: ASHLEY CARSON COTTINGHAM, in her official capacity as the Director of Aging and People with Disabilities, Oregon Department of Human Services, CLYDE SAIKI, in his personal and official capacity as former Director of Department of Human Services, State of Oregon and FARIBORZ PAKSERESHT, in his personal and official capacity as Director of Department of Human Services, State of Oregon
Preserve Our Islands, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 09-35917
Plaintiff - Appellee: PRESERVE OUR ISLANDS, a Washington Non-profit Corporation, PEOPLE FOR PUGET SOUND, a Washington Non-profit Corporation and WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, a Washington Non-profit Corporation
Defendant - Appellant: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MICHAEL MCCORMICK, in his official capacity as District Engineer for the Seattle District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Defendant-intervenor: NORTHWEST AGGREGATES COMPANY
Preserve Our Islands et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv01353
Plaintiff: Preserve Our Islands, People For Puget Sound and Washington Environmental Council
Defendant: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Col. Michael McCormick, United States National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Other Statutes None
Friends of Magnuson Park v. US Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2008cv00062
Plaintiff: Friends of Magnuson Park and Friends of Magnuson Park
Defendant: US Army Corps of Engineers, Michael McCormick and City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04228
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
David Johnson et al v. Leonis Malburg et al
as 8:2007cv00218
Plaintiff: David Johnson, David Johnson, Don Huff and others
Defendant: Leonis Malburg, William Davis, Michael McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?