Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Jung Mok v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04235
Plaintiff:
Jung Mok
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Wimberly v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Craig Ervin Wimberly
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, C. Herman, J. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hash v. Petrovic et al
as 5:2022cv05255
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
D. Petrovic, M. Giacomazzi, D. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mok v. Ross Dress for Less Incorporated
as 2:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Christian Mok
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Terrance Irby v. Clifford Johnson, et al
as 22-35033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE JON IRBY
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFFORD JOHNSON, Doctor, Clallam Bay Corrections Center, STEPHEN SINCLAIR, Former Secretary, Department of Corrections, CHERYL STRANGE, Secretary, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv09965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Irby v. Johnson et al
as 3:2021cv05605
Plaintiff:
Terrance Jon Irby
Defendant:
Clifford Johnson, Stephen Sinclair, Cheryl Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hash v. Giacomazzi et al
as 5:2020cv01116
Defendant:
S. Lucas, C. Remillard, R. Persaud and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
