Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Segui et al v. Stromfors et al
as 2:2024cv01171
Plaintiff:
Shai Segui and Unknown Parties
Defendant:
Stephanie Stromfors, Diana Vigil, Randy Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colvin v. M.J. Dean Construction, Inc.
as 24-2082
Plaintiff:
PARNELL COLVIN
Defendant:
M.J. DEAN CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Fair v. Turley, et al.
as 24-1846
Plaintiff:
PARNELL JAY FAIR
Defendant:
LUKAS TURLEY and ALEXANDER RYNDAK
Mun v. Robideaux et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
John Mun
Defendant:
Valerie Robideaux, Melanie Hulbert, Sean Parnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riddick et al v. Sony Electronics Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Bert Riddick, Harry Crouch, Bill Greenblatt and others
Defendant:
Sony Electronics Inc., Michaela Ion, Matthew Parnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal
Parnell et al v. City of Berkeley
as 3:2023cv06379
Plaintiff:
Lawanda Parnell, Merced Dominguez, Mike Douglas and others
Defendant:
City of Berkeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shavortis Powell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2023cv07122
Plaintiff:
Shavortis Powell, Emery Day, Jessica Knoke and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Parnell Colvin v. Tako, LLC
as 23-15080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PARNELL COLVIN
Defendant / Appellee:
TAKO, LLC
Charles K. Scott v. The People Of The State Of California
as 5:2023cv00087
Petitioner:
Charles K. Scott, Jr. and Parnell K. Curtis
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
