Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Goering-Runyan v. USA
as 3:2024cv00735
Petitioner: Daniel Lynn Goering-Runyan
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00547
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
USA v. Daniel Goering-Runyan
as 22-30194
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DANIEL LYNN GOERING-RUNYAN, AKA Dan Runyan
Michael Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04986
Plaintiff: Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson, Kevin Patton and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Runyan v. Target Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00006
Plaintiff: Debra Runyan
Defendant: Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Runyan v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
as 6:2021cv01341
Plaintiff: Danieal Runyan
Defendant: Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv04810
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv04813
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv03030
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mendel v. Chao We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv03244
Plaintiff: S. Patrick Mendel and Sameh Fahmi Moustafa
Defendant: Elaine Chao, Raiser-CA, LLC, Ryan Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?