Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Randy Scott Campos v. The Pep Boys Manny Moe and Jack of California, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Randy Scott Campos
Defendant:
The Pep Boys Manny Moe and Jack of California, LLC, Icahn Automotive Group, LLC and Does 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Darden v. C.M.S. et al
as 3:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Dustin Thomas House Darden
Defendant:
C.M.S., Jeff Nelson, Randy Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Decker et al v. Zonic et al
as 3:2023cv08077
Plaintiff:
Randy Scott Decker and Kristen Susanne Waldman
Defendant:
Omer Zonic, Unknown Zonic, Mavric Trucking Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Randy Klippenstein v. Scott Frauenheim
as 21-16828
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDY SCOTT KLIPPENSTEIN
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Warden
Randy Diehl v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 21-16273
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDY SCOTT DIEHL
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director
Scott v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
as 3:2021cv05131
Plaintiff:
Randy Scott
Defendant:
Johnson Controls, Inc. doing business as Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riordan #325560 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01497
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Randy Scott Riordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(SS) Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00462
Plaintiff:
Randy Scott Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
(HC) Klippenstein v. Fraunheim
as 1:2019cv01705
Respondent:
Scott Fraunheim
Petitioner:
Randy Scott Klippenstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Klippenstein v. Fraunheim
as 1:2019at00884
Defendant:
Warden Scott Fraunheim
Petitioner:
Randy Scott Klippenstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
