Cases 1 - 10 of 12
De Sotell v. Nevins et al
as 2:2021cv01082
Plaintiff:
Robert De Sotell and Robert E De Sotell
Defendant:
Tricia Nevins, United States of America and Tricia L Nevins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
American Heart Association vs. De Leon
as 1:2019cv00145
Defendant:
Robert Seth De Leon and Robert Seth De Leon doing business as Maui CPR & First Aid
Plaintiff:
American Heart Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Van De Vanter #276291 v. Corizon Healthcare LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00276
Plaintiff:
Stephen Robert Van De Vanter
Defendant:
Corizon Healthcare LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Fox, et al v. U.S. Bankruptcy Court Eastern
as 16-72631
:
In re: ANDREW FOX and MARINA FOX
Petitioner:
ANDREW FOX and MARINA FOX
Respondent:
U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
ROBERT MICHAEL DE LONG, Debtor
Van De Vanter #276291 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02451
Plaintiff:
Stephen Robert Van De Vanter
Defendant:
M Hegmann, Stephenie Stehle, Corizon Health Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re Google, Inc. Privacy Policy Litigation
as 5:2012cv01382
Plaintiff:
Robert B. De Mars and Lorena Barrios
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Van De Vanter v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2012cv00852
Plaintiff:
Stephen Robert Van De Vanter
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hung Ha v. Justine Tseng, et al
as 11-15926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES HA
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTINE TSENG, ROBERT F. DE SMET and JON ROLEFSON
Ha v. Tseng et al
as 4:2011mc80021
Plaintiff:
James Ha
Defendant:
Justine Tseng, Robert F. de Smet and Jon Rolefson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
