Cases 1 - 10 of 582
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. One IA Potters House Church et al
as 2:2024cv04076
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant:
One IA Potters House Church, Potters House Church of LA, St. Philip Neri Catholic Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rocha v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Blas Jesse Rocha, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
(PC) Rocha v. Monroe, et al.
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Randy Joe Rocha
Defendant:
Atlee M Monroe, James Fontento, M Kieu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
De Rocha Express, Inc v. Combined Resources, Inc
as 4:2024cv02037
Plaintiff:
De Rocha Express, Inc
Defendant:
COMBINED RESOURCES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Beltran-Rocha v. Garland
as 24-1669
Petitioner:
EDRI JOSE BELTRAN-ROCHA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alonzo McKinney v. Rocha
as 2:2024cv02295
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKinney
Respondent:
Rocha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Piombino v. City of Fresno, et al.
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Piombino
Defendant:
City of Fresno, Steve Rocha and Corey Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rocha v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2024cv01468
Plaintiff:
Alcira Rocha
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
