Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Henson et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00367
Plaintiff: Patricia Henson and Chaz Henson
Defendant: Forest River, Inc., JP RVS REPO DEPOT, LLC doing business as Cordelia RV Center and Russell Davis doing business as Rusty's Details
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
In Re Ethereummax Investor Litigation
as 2:2022cv00163
Plaintiff: Ryan Huegerich, Christopher DeLuca, Neil Shah and others
Defendant: Steve Gentile, Giovanni Perone, Justin French and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Jonathan Semerjian, Nabil Nahlah, Till Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Sywula v. DaCosta et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01456
Plaintiff: Krzysztof Sywula
Defendant: Alexis DaCosta, Teleport Mobility, Inc., Northern Lights, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0256
Debra Milke v. City of Phoenix, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-17210
Defendant: WALTER E. BIRKBY, in his individual capacity, CHARLES MASINO, Detective, PHILLIP WOLSLAGEL, in his individual capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF PHOENIX, SILVERIO ONTIVEROS, Sergeant, COUNTY OF MARICOPA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEBRA JEAN MILKE
Escobar et al v. City of San Jose We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv01394
Plaintiff: Daniel Escobar , David Betancourt , David Blackwell and others
Defendant: City of San Jose
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Davis v. U.S. Department of the Air Force We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00068
Plaintiff: Kenneth Russell Davis, Jr.
Defendant: U.S. Department of the Air Force
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Milke v. Phoenix, City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00462
Plaintiff: Milke and Debra Jean Milke
Defendant: Phoenix, City of, Charles Masino, Silverio Ontiveros and others
Intervenor: James Lynn Styers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alejandro Rodriguez, et al v. Timothy Robbins, et al
as 13-56755
Petitioner - Appellant: ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals, ABDIRIZAK ADEN FARAH, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals, JOSE FARIAS CORNEJO and others
Petitioner: EFREN OROZCO
Respondent - Appellee: TIMOTHY ROBBINS, Field Office Director, Los Angeles District, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, WESLEY LEE, Assistant Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Alejandro Rodriguez, et al v. Timothy Robbins, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-56706
Petitioner - Appellee: ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals, ABDIRIZAK ADEN FARAH, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals, JOSE FARIAS CORNEJO and others
Petitioner: EFREN OROZCO
Respondent - Appellant: TIMOTHY ROBBINS, Field Office Director, Los Angeles District, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary, Homeland Security, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and others
Alejandro Rodriguez, et al v. Timothy Robbins, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-56734
Petitioner - Appellee: ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals, ABDIRIZAK ADEN FARAH, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals, JOSE FARIAS CORNEJO and others
Petitioner: EFREN OROZCO
Respondent - Appellant: TIMOTHY ROBBINS, Field Office Director, Los Angeles District, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary, Homeland Security, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?