Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lopes v. Reddit, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv08086
Defendant:
Erin Baldassari, Ryan Thompson, First Media and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Lopes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jessica Hernandez v. San Jose Mercury-News, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00145
Defendant:
Does and San Jose Mercury-News, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jessica Hernandez
Pierce v. Sacramento News & Review et al
as 2:2015cv02650
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Defendant:
Sacramento News & Review, Bay Area Press, Vallejo Times Herald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Northwest Administrators, Inc v. San Jose Mercury-News, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01767
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators, Inc
Defendant:
San Jose Mercury-News, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Gilbert Marosi v. Conrad Rushing, et al
as 14-16040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILBERT MAROSI
Defendant - Appellee:
CONRAD RUSHING, Presiding Justice Sixth District Court of Appeals, EUGENE M. PREMO, NATHAN D. MIHARA, Associate Justice and others
Gilbert Marosi v. Conrad Rushing, et al
as 14-16040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT MAROSI
Defendant / Appellee:
CONRAD RUSHING, Presiding Justice Sixth District Court of Appeals, EUGENE M. PREMO, NATHAN D. MIHARA, Associate Justice and others
Marosi v. Rushing et al
as 3:2013cv05198
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Marosi
Defendant:
Conrad Rushing, Eugene M Premo, Nathan D. Mihara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Marosi v. Rushing et al
as 5:2013cv05198
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Marosi
Defendant:
Conrad Rushing, Eugene M Premo, Nathan D. Mihara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Musselman v. AM New York et al
as 2:2012mc00015
Plaintiff:
Carla P Musselman
Defendant:
AM New York, Ang Newspapers, Ari Paget and others
Williams v. Haag et al
as 3:2012cv03310
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Lee Williams
Defendant:
Melinda Haag, Jerry Brown, Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
