Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
(PS) Cody et al v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2023cv02318
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cody, Skylar Cody and Kaycie Cody
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin, Mary Graham Children's Shelter, Lazaro Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Schaeffer v. Mumey et al
as 3:2023cv01503
Plaintiff:
Noah Schaeffer
Defendant:
Scott Mumey, Joseph Zepeda and Sean Mumey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amber Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 2:2023cv06439
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Amber Doe v. Michael Lewis Goguen et al
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Michael Lewis Goguen, Sequoia Capital, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schaeffer v. Stayton Hospital
as 6:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Brian Schaeffer
Defendant:
Stayton Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schaeffer v. Stayton Police et al
as 6:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Brian Schaeffer
Defendant:
Stayton Police, David Bivens, Travis Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
