Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Scott Joseph Faulkner v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph Faulkner
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Sheriff Chad Bianco, Medical Director Thomas Minahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph McKinney
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scott Joseph Faulkner v. Alan Heidrich et al
as 5:2023cv01784
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph Faulkner
Defendant:
Met Officer Alan Heidrich, Detective David Lynn and Sergeant Jeremy Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J. Medina et al v. Victor Garcia et al
as 2:2023cv06393
Plaintiff:
J. MEDINA and O. MEDINA
Petitioner:
Jennifer Garcia
Defendant:
VICTOR GARCIA, SCOTT JOSEPH CARPENTER, JILL WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Napier v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv01996
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph Napier
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Joseph v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02139
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Mark Scott Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott Joseph Wallace v. Cellco Partnership et al
as 2:2015cv08680
Defendant:
AT and T Mobility LLC, Chief Charlie Beck, CITY OF LOS ANGELES and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph Wallace
Scott Joseph Barker v. Jeffrey Beard, Secretary CDCR
as 5:2015cv01849
Petitioner:
Scott Joseph Barker
Respondent:
Jeffrey Beard
Hineman v. USA
as 9:2015cv00093
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Scott Joseph Hineman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Scott Joseph Wallace v. Celco Partnership et al
as 2:2014cv08052
Defendant:
Chief Charlie Beck, Celco Partnership, City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph Wallace
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
